PLEASE NOTE: This site is an archival resource, no longer updated as of June 1, 2026. Current questions: The Fiscal Lab.
The Economy

Addressing Midnight Regulations

The Economy Policy Rapid Response BlogNovember 12, 2024 By Anthony Campau

Introduction

  • The Congressional Review Act (CRA) is a powerful mechanism to overturn recent regulations, but its impact is limited by Congress’s present inability to bundle multiple rules into a single vote, and by limited Senate floor time.
  • The Midnight Rules Relief Act (MRRA) would amend the CRA to allow many recent regulations to be overturned with a single joint resolution of disapproval.
  • The MRRA would also extend the “lookback” window of the CRA from the current 60-day period to the entire fourth year of the Biden Administration.
  • Because the CRA already prevents an agency from ever reissuing a rule that is “substantially the same” as a rule overturned by the CRA, the 119th Congress and President Trump could quickly, dramatically, and permanently roll back hundreds of regulations through the expedited processes of the CRA/MRRA. 
  • The self-identified cost of key rules finalized since Jan. 20, 2024 – and thus reachable by the CRA as amended by the MRRA – is a staggering $1.324 trillion. That’s more regulatory burden than President Obama imposed over eight years!

The Opportunity Offered by the MRRA

The House Judiciary Committee recently passed the Midnight Rules Relief Act (MRRA), which would amend the Congressional Review Act (CRA) in two important ways. First, it would allow Congress to bundle multiple rules into a single joint resolution of disapproval, cutting down on the amount of floor time needed to overturn new rules. Second, it would expand the CRA’s “lookback” provision to the entire final year of a president’s term, significantly increasing the number of rules that may be reviewed by a new Congress. The implications of these two changes are extremely important.

1. The MRRA would put more than $1 trillion of Biden-Harris rules within the CRA “lookback” window of the 119thCongress, which means the next Congress and President could use the MRRA to effectuate swift, major regulatory rollbacks.

If passed later this year or early next year, the MRRA, which has been introduced in both the House and Senate, would allow the 119thCongress to conduct a CRA review of any rule finalized and submitted to Congress during the final year of the Biden-Harris Administration. That means many of the rules finalized this spring, prior to what was widely viewed as the earliest possible start of the forthcoming CRA lookback period, would be reachable by the 119th Congress and President Trump. Because multiple rules could be bundled into a single joint resolution of disapproval, the MRRA would potentially allow President Trump and the incoming Congress to overturn dozens – possible even hundreds – of rules using the CRA’s legislative fast-track procedures. According to data from the American Action Forum (AAF), the cost of just 313 rules finalized since January 20th of this year was a staggering $1.324 trillion (subtract their early January data from their current total). Yes, that’s trillion with a “t.” That makes up a substantial portion of the $1.8+ trillion of regulatory costs imposed by the Biden-Harris Administration since inauguration day, and it easily surpasses the $890 billion of regulatory costs imposed across all eight years of the Obama Administration. It’s also important to note that these cost calculations are based only on finalized rules that include meaningful cost projections. Many other categories of rules – such as proposed but not yet final rules, significant guidance documents, and other types of regulatory actions that include little or no quantified analysis but still have meaningful impacts – aren’t counted in this total but could still be reachable with the CRA/MRRA.

2. Robust use of the CRA/MRRA would allow the Trump Administration to shift its focus more quickly from midnight rules to important new policy priorities.

The early months and years of recent presidential administrations have been spent slowing, stopping, and overturning the regulations of the outgoing administration, distracting from other priorities the new administration may wish to pursue. If Congress were to pass the MRRA and robustly use the augmented CRA powers, it could work with President Trump to address potentially hundreds of recent rules and allow the new administration to focus more quickly and fully on other priorities.

Conclusion

During times when the CRA could be most effective, its primary limiting factor is the need to spend congressional floor time on other important priorities, including Senate confirmations and passing key legislation. The MRRA would free up floor time, allow many midnight rules to be addressed expeditiously, and enable the Trump Administration to focus its early resources on important new priorities rather than being consumed with overturning or retooling only the most recent regulations.

For Further Reading

Author

Anthony P. Campau

Anthony P. Campau

Fellow in Regulatory Modernization and Alignment

Anthony P. Campau is a Fellow in Regulatory Modernization and Alignment at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC) in Washington, DC. Campau previously served as Chief of Staff and Counselor for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which oversees the development of regulatory and information policy across the Executive Branch of the U.S. federal government. In that capacity, he worked with the senior political and career leadership of federal departments and agencies on the development of new regulations, information collections, and key guidance. He helped to lead interagency collaborations on a range of technical regulatory matters, contributed to international regulatory cooperation activities, and helped to strengthen and enforce federal information policy standards. Having also served as a Core Member of the Regulatory Reform Team on the 2016 Presidential Transition Team and as a member of the Beachhead Team at OMB/OIRA, Campau also played an early role in helping to develop and implement significant regulatory process and policy reforms across the U.S. federal government. Campau clerked for Judge Neomi Rao of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and was a regulatory policy fellow at the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation. He has testified before Congress on regulatory issues, represented the U.S. federal government in numerous international regulatory cooperation initiatives, published and spoken widely on regulatory topics, and contributed to collaborative works such as the Mandate for Leadership . Campau earned a J.D. and an LL.M. in securities and financial regulation from Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. in history from Southeastern University.

More from Anthony P. Campau →

← All work