PLEASE NOTE: This site is an archival resource, no longer updated as of June 1, 2026. Current questions: The Fiscal Lab.
Social Programs

EPIC EXPLAINER: Food Stamp Categorical Eligibility

Social Programs EPIC Explainers Blog ResourceFebruary 5, 2026 By Matthew Dickerson

Introduction

Millions of Food Stamp recipients do not meet the program’s own federal income and asset limit rules because of categorical eligibility, costing billions of dollars.
Categorical eligibility allows a person to automatically be eligible for a welfare program based on their receipt of another welfare program. In the Food Stamp program, a household can qualify if they first receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or a state General Assistance (GA) benefit. Categorical eligibility means the household does not need to follow the normal Food Stamp eligibility rules.

Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE) Loophole

Broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE) allows households to be deemed eligible for Food Stamps by being provided a nominal TANF “benefit,” such as an informational pamphlet or access to an 800 number. These nominal, non-cash TANF “benefits” were deemed permissible and encouraged by regulation and guidance from the Clinton and Obama Administrations. Under the BBCE regulations, states can completely waive the asset test, waive the net income test, and increase the gross income limit to 200 percent of the federal poverty level (from 130 percent of FPL). Even millionaires can qualify for Food Stamps thanks to the categorical eligibility loophole. BBCE Table

Only Seven States Follow the Federal Standards for Food Stamps

44 states (including Washington, D.C.) do not follow the federal rules for Food Stamp eligibility and instead use BBCE.

Millions Get Food Stamps Despite Not Meeting the Federal Eligibility Rules

Millions of individuals receive Food Stamps despite not meeting the federal eligibility rules. Although these individuals have income or assets above the limits, they can enroll in Food Stamps due to categorical eligibility. When states use categorical eligibility, they do not have to collect or verify detailed information about the assets owned by Food Stamp applicants. As a result, no one knows exactly how many people are getting Food Stamp benefits despite failing to meet the federal eligibility standards. A report for the USDA estimated that 5.6 million individuals were made eligible by BBCE and received Food Stamps, but “did not meet the Federal SNAP income or resource rules” in FY 2022, equivalent to 14 percent of total enrollment. Food Stamp BBCE Number Recipients Exceed Eligibility 1.2.2026 The cost of categorical eligibility is projected to exceed $100 billion over the next decade by the Foundation for Government Accountability.

Categorical Eligibility Can be Used to Hide Improper Payments

Categorical eligibility makes it easier for states to report lower improper payment rates by avoiding enforcement of the federal Food Stamp eligibility rules. When states use categorical eligibility, they do not have to verify the assets owned by applicants. States have more flexibility in verifying gross income, as they can increase the maximum limit above the federal 130 percent of the FPL standard. States can also disregard the net income test. These lost check points create room for fraud. The USDA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported that the use of BBCE “significantly understated the SNAP error rate since BBCE recipients’ eligibility was not assessed during the [quality control] reviews.”

Author

Matthew D. Dickerson

Matthew D. Dickerson

Director of Budget Policy

Matthew D. Dickerson is Director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). Dickerson is recognized as an expert on fiscal policy issues, including the budget, appropriations, and entitlement reform. His articles have been featured in the Wall Street Journal , the Miami Herald , National Review , the Sacramento Bee , the Washington Times , the Baltimore Sun , The Hill , the Washington Examiner , and other outlets. Prior to joining EPIC, Dickerson served as Senior Policy Advisor on the staff of the House Budget Committee, where he helped lead development of the fiscal year 2024 budget resolution. He has a dozen years of experience on Capitol Hill, including as a senior staffer with the Republican Study Committee (RSC), the caucus of conservatives in the House of Representatives. Under four different RSC chairmen, Dickerson held senior level roles including Policy Director and Senior Policy Staff. Additionally, he served as Legislative Director and other policy positions for the late Congressman C.W. Bill Young (R-FL), a former Chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. During his tenure at The Heritage Foundation, Dickerson was Director of the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget. In this capacity, he oversaw a team of budget analysts and economists researching diverse subjects including spending, entitlements, budget process, tax, labor, pensions, and infrastructure issues. He has also been a Policy Manager at Americans for Prosperity, where he supervised a team of fellows and analysts covering a variety of federal and state policy issues. Dickerson is a graduate of the College of William and Mary in Virginia and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Government and History.

More from Matthew D. Dickerson →

← All work