PLEASE NOTE: This site is an archival resource, no longer updated as of June 1, 2026. Current questions: The Fiscal Lab.
The Federal Budget: Spending, Taxes, and Debt

EPIC EXPLAINER: The Corporate Income Tax

American Employers Face a Higher Corporate Tax Rate than in Communist China

The Federal Budget: Spending, Taxes, and Debt EPIC Explainers PublicationAugust 19, 2024 By Matthew Dickerson

Introduction

The corporate tax is one of the most harmful federal taxes, resulting in lower pay for workers. Tax increases on employers would hurt families.

American Employers Face a Higher Corporate Tax Rate than in Communist China

The corporate tax in the United States reduces the competitiveness of American businesses, directly harming American families. The U.S. federal corporate tax rate is 21%. Adding the average state tax rate brings the average total rate to 25.8%. That means employers in the United States face a higher corporate tax rate than the 25% rate imposed by the Chinese Communist Party. The U.S. corporate rate is higher than the average of our major international competitors in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Corporate Income Tax

The Corporate Tax Is One of the Most Destructive Taxes

The corporate income tax is one the most harmful and destructive taxes because it is a tax on the results of economically productive activity in the private sector. This tax hurts workers and consumers as well as shareholders. Business taxes are, of course, paid by real people. Workers bear 70% or more of the corporate tax burden in the form of lower wages, according to studies by the Tax Foundation and the Heritage Foundation.
Because of the Corporate Tax:
  • Workers face Lower Wages
  • Investors face Lower Returns
  • Consumers face Higher Prices
Corporate profits are subject to double taxation as a result of the corporate tax. After paying the corporate tax, the remaining profits are distributed to shareholders, who then pay taxes on those dividends or capital gains. This double layer of taxation on the same dollar of income is destructive and distortionary. Double Taxation Of Investment In Corporations

2017 Tax Cuts Made America More Competitive

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 made key improvements to the corporate tax. Most importantly, the TCJA permanently reduced the corporate tax rate to 21%. This was by far the most pro-growth policy in the 2017 law. Before TCJA, the U.S. corporate tax rate was 35%, the highest in the industrialized world. To offset the cost of the tax cut and simplify the tax code, several corporate tax credits and deductions were repealed. The TCJA overhauled the international business tax system, ending the uncompetitive worldwide taxation of American-headquartered businesses and instituting a modified territorial tax system. The combination of the high tax rate and the worldwide system had led to American companies moving abroad through inversions. By providing full and immediate expensing, the TCJA allowed businesses to immediately deduct the full costs of capital investments, replacing longer depreciation schedules and removing a significant tax bias against investment. Expensing began phasing out in 2023 and is set to expire completely in 2027 if not renewed.

Corporate Tax Application

The federal corporate income tax applies to businesses incorporated as C Corporations. Other businesses, such as S Corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships, are considered pass through entities subject to the individual income tax. The corporate income tax is levied on the firm’s profits. Profit equals the total revenue minus business costs. The tax liability can be reduced by various credits and deductions. In FY 2023, federal corporate tax receipts were $420 billion. This was 10% of total revenues.

Author

Matthew D. Dickerson

Matthew D. Dickerson

Director of Budget Policy

Matthew D. Dickerson is Director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). Dickerson is recognized as an expert on fiscal policy issues, including the budget, appropriations, and entitlement reform. His articles have been featured in the Wall Street Journal , the Miami Herald , National Review , the Sacramento Bee , the Washington Times , the Baltimore Sun , The Hill , the Washington Examiner , and other outlets. Prior to joining EPIC, Dickerson served as Senior Policy Advisor on the staff of the House Budget Committee, where he helped lead development of the fiscal year 2024 budget resolution. He has a dozen years of experience on Capitol Hill, including as a senior staffer with the Republican Study Committee (RSC), the caucus of conservatives in the House of Representatives. Under four different RSC chairmen, Dickerson held senior level roles including Policy Director and Senior Policy Staff. Additionally, he served as Legislative Director and other policy positions for the late Congressman C.W. Bill Young (R-FL), a former Chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. During his tenure at The Heritage Foundation, Dickerson was Director of the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget. In this capacity, he oversaw a team of budget analysts and economists researching diverse subjects including spending, entitlements, budget process, tax, labor, pensions, and infrastructure issues. He has also been a Policy Manager at Americans for Prosperity, where he supervised a team of fellows and analysts covering a variety of federal and state policy issues. Dickerson is a graduate of the College of William and Mary in Virginia and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Government and History.

More from Matthew D. Dickerson →

← All work