PLEASE NOTE: This site is an archival resource, no longer updated as of June 1, 2026. Current questions: The Fiscal Lab.
Education, Workforce, and Retirement

EPIC EXPLAINER: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Education, Workforce, and Retirement EPIC Explainers ResourceSeptember 23, 2024 By Rachel Greszler

Introduction

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is a self-funded government agency that provides mandatory private pension insurance.

Background & History of the PBGC

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is a public agency, but unlike most other government agencies, it is self-funded and cannot use taxpayer dollars (see caveat on recent taxpayer bailouts below). The PBGC was created as part of the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). ERISA was enacted in the wake of the Studebaker auto plant closing in 1963, causing thousands of workers and retirees to lose promised pension benefits. The PBGC is effectively a federally mandated insurance program for all private pensions. If an employer goes out of business and does not have enough money in its own pension plan to pay promised pension benefits, the PBGC steps in and pays all or a portion of promised benefits. How much the PBGC pays depends on the type of pension plan and the worker’s years of service. In total, the PBGC provides pension insurance to about 25,000 private pension plans covering roughly 34 million workers and retirees.[i] Unlike a typical insurance company, however, the PBGC cannot set its own terms and rates, but must rely on Congress to do so. Because the PBGC cannot respond in real time to changing conditions, the PBGC is not actually in control of the finances of its insurance programs. As a result, its financial soundness has varied significantly over time.

Two Separate Programs: Single-Employer and Multiemployer

PBGC Program Comps The PBGC’s multiemployer program, which covers union pension plans, was within five years of insolvency prior to a politically motivated and partisan taxpayer bailout—labeled “special financial assistance”—passed under the guise of COVID-19 relief in the American Rescue Plan Act. Those bailouts merely kicked the can down the road as the PBGC’s multiemployer program still has a net negative long-term financial position.[ii]

Are Taxpayers Now Responsible for the PBGC?

The PBGC is not supposed to affect anyone who does not have a private pension. However, the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act’s creation of a “Special Financial Assistance” program (administered through the PBGC’s multiemployer program) put taxpayers on the hook for an estimated $97 billion of one-time bailout funds delivered directly to roughly 250 deeply troubled multiemployer pension plans covering 3 million participants.[iii] The one-time Special Financial Assistance did not change the PBGC’s future funding or premiums. Legally, the PBGC remains a self-funded agency. However, because the $97 billion in Special Financial Assistance covers only 12 percent of multiemployer pension plans’ $823 billion in total unfunded liabilities, the bailout incentivized even greater underfunding of multiemployer pension plans, and arguably set a precedent that increased the risk of additional future taxpayer bailouts.[iv] Bailout Percent Pie Chart Maintaining the PBGC’s mission of protecting participants of private pension plans while not unjustly shifting the burden of bad actors onto taxpayers requires significant reforms to PBGC’s multiemployer pension program, transitioning it into true, risk-based insurance. Simultaneously, policymakers must provide equal protection for union and non-union pensioners by applying the same funding rules to union pension plans as currently apply to non-union pension plans.   [i] PBGC, “2021 Pension Insurance Data Tables,” February 12, 2024, https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021-pension-data-tables.pdf (accessed September 9, 2024). [ii] PBGC, “Projections Report FY 2023,” https://www.pbgc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fy-2023-projections-report.pdf (accessed September 3, 2024). [iii] PBGC, “American Rescue Plan Act FAQs,” https://www.pbgc.gov/arp-faqs (accessed September 9, 2024). [iv] PBGC, “2021 Pension Insurance Data Tables.”

Author

Rachel Greszler

Rachel Greszler

Visiting Fellow in Workforce

Rachel Greszler is a Visiting Fellow in Workforce at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). Greszler is recognized as an economic expert in workforce, retirement, and fiscal issues. Her articles have been featured in the Wall Street Journal , The Washington Post , National Review , The Hill , Fox , CNN , and other outlets. She is regularly called on to testify before Congress, and has done so dozens of times over the past decade. Greszler’s work focuses on policies that promote economic growth, individual freedom and well-being, and fiscal sanity. Specifically, she researches and writes about: expanding employment opportunities; independent work; women’s issues; the minimum wage; paid family leave and other family-friendly workplace policies; Social Security; disability insurance; pensions; federal employee compensation; and improper federal government payments. Greszler is also currently Senior Research Fellow in the Plymouth Institute for Free Enterprise at Advancing American Freedom (AAF). Prior to joining AAF in 2025, Greszler was a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation for 12 years and a senior economist on the staff of the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress for seven years. She completed her graduate studies at Georgetown University, where she earned master’s degrees in both economics and public policy. She also holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Mary Washington, where she currently serves on the Board of Visitors. Greszler grew up in a small town in Western New York and currently resides in Bethesda, Maryland, with her husband and six children.

More from Rachel Greszler →

← All work