PLEASE NOTE: This site is an archival resource, no longer updated as of June 1, 2026. Current questions: The Fiscal Lab.
The Federal Budget: Spending, Taxes, and Debt

EPIC Analysis: Comparing Potential Discretionary Spending Options, FY 2023 - 2024

The Federal Budget: Spending, Taxes, and Debt EPIC Explainers ResourceFebruary 26, 2024 By Matthew Dickerson

Analysis

Congress has yet to agree on FY 2024 appropriations levels and policies. Legislative options under discussion include: 1) a package written to the Johnson-Schumer levels that adds tens of billions to the Fiscal Responsibility Act non-defense levels; or 2) a full year continuing resolution (CR). Also under consideration is a large supplemental foreign aid package. The table and chart below compare these options with the enacted FY 2023 Omnibus. Enacting a full year CR without an unpaid-for supplemental would be the most fiscally responsible of these options, as well as providing an increase in defense funding.

Table 1. Total Discretionary Spending for FY 2023 and FY 2024 (Billions of Dollars)

Total Discretionary Spending For FY 2023 And FY 2024 *Estimated based on FY 2023 enacted. + Represents potential for future supplementals, such as for natural disasters. Sources: Congressional Budget Office, Office of Management and Budget. A full year CR would keep total discretionary spending about $130 billion below FY 2023. Under a full year CR, regular defense would be $1.4 billion higher, while regular non-defense would be $40 billion less than FY 2023, because a full year CR would enforce the Fiscal Responsibility Act cap on base non-defense spending of $703.7 billion, without side deals or other supplementals. Enacting an omnibus at the Johnson-Schumer levels would keep total discretionary spending $63 below the FY 2023 level. However, these savings are entirely attributable to the FY 2023 supplemental appropriations, primarily for Ukraine aid. The Johnson-Schumer agreement would take regular defense appropriations about $28 billion and regular non-defense appropriations about $1 billion higher than FY 2023. Discretionary Funding Options - 2.25.2024 Speaker Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Schumer reportedly reached a "side-deal" to increase non-defense discretionary spending $69 above the statutory cap specified in the Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Table 2. Johnson-Schumer Agreement (Billions of Dollars)

Johnson Schumer Agreement

Policy Riders vs. Spending Cuts

Restraining excessive spending is an important goal, as is including policy riders to rein in burdensome regulations and prevent funding controversial and harmful activities. The statutory spending caps provide significant leverage in these negotiations. If the Biden Administration insists on no new policy riders, Congress should insist on a full year CR that would lock in spending cuts. If a complete appropriations package is agreed to, the new policy riders should be worth the trade-off between the full year CR and the Johnson-Schumer levels.

Author

Matthew D. Dickerson

Matthew D. Dickerson

Director of Budget Policy

Matthew D. Dickerson is Director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC). Dickerson is recognized as an expert on fiscal policy issues, including the budget, appropriations, and entitlement reform. His articles have been featured in the Wall Street Journal , the Miami Herald , National Review , the Sacramento Bee , the Washington Times , the Baltimore Sun , The Hill , the Washington Examiner , and other outlets. Prior to joining EPIC, Dickerson served as Senior Policy Advisor on the staff of the House Budget Committee, where he helped lead development of the fiscal year 2024 budget resolution. He has a dozen years of experience on Capitol Hill, including as a senior staffer with the Republican Study Committee (RSC), the caucus of conservatives in the House of Representatives. Under four different RSC chairmen, Dickerson held senior level roles including Policy Director and Senior Policy Staff. Additionally, he served as Legislative Director and other policy positions for the late Congressman C.W. Bill Young (R-FL), a former Chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. During his tenure at The Heritage Foundation, Dickerson was Director of the Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget. In this capacity, he oversaw a team of budget analysts and economists researching diverse subjects including spending, entitlements, budget process, tax, labor, pensions, and infrastructure issues. He has also been a Policy Manager at Americans for Prosperity, where he supervised a team of fellows and analysts covering a variety of federal and state policy issues. Dickerson is a graduate of the College of William and Mary in Virginia and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Government and History.

More from Matthew D. Dickerson →

← All work