Putting the Reconciliation Instructions Into Context

Unsplash Photo
Putting the Reconciliation Instructions Into Context

The House and Senate Budget Committees have both passed budget resolutions that would begin the budget reconciliation process, as the two chambers work to come to a final agreement.

The budget resolutions include instructions to House and Senate committees to advance policies that are critical for increasing economic growth and opportunity, including investments in immigration enforcement and a national defense, extending the Trump tax cuts, and ensuring savings to put the budget on a more sustainable fiscal trajectory.

Unsurprisingly, some in the D.C. swamp have pounced on the proposed savings.

Let’s put reconciliation in context of the overall federal budget.

Saving 2.3% for Taxpayers

The House budget resolution provides instructions to seven House committees to reduce the deficit. The House budget also includes a deficit reduction failsafe requiring $2 trillion of deficit reduction over the FY 2025 – 2034 period.

The Senate budget resolution provides instructions to four Senate committees to reduce the deficit by at least $1 billion each over the next decade, for a minimum total of $4 billion in savings.

These savings would represent a better direction for the budget.

However, honest commentators must acknowledge that those figures pale in comparison to the government’s spending plans over the next decade.

The Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) projected baseline includes $85.8 trillion of spending over the FY 2025 – 2034 period. Over that time, spending is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 4.3%, about twice the rate of projected inflation.

Reconciliation Savings vs. Spending

If the House’s proposed $2 trillion of savings is achieved, that would amount to a modest 2.3% of the government’s planned spending over the next decade.

The Senate’s $4 billion in savings represents just 0.01% of the $85.8 trillion in planned spending.

For perspective, if Congress simply held the growth of spending to the very reasonable rate of population increases plus inflation, that would achieve nearly $6 trillion in savings, about 7% of the planned spending.

While the swamp wails over moderately slowing the growth of Washington D.C. agency budgets, they seem to forget what the American people just went through. As a result of the excessive government spending that sparked the highest rates of inflation in four decades, the average American worker has seen their real take home pay fall by 3.9% in just four years.

Spending Would Still Be Very High After Reconciliation

Assuming the House reconciliation instructions are followed, total federal spending would fall to “just” $84.1 trillion over the next decade.

If only the minimum $4 billion of savings required by the Senate budget resolution is achieved, then federal spending would actually increase, after investments in border security and national defense are made.Spending After Reconciliation

The Government Will Still Collect a Lot of Taxes After Reconciliation

Assuming key provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire, the CBO projects baseline revenues to be $64.7 trillion over the FY 2025 – 2034 period.

Of course, no one thinks that Congress or President Trump will allow the largest tax increase in American history to happen at the end of this year.

The House budget resolution provides a reconciliation instruction to the House Ways and Means Committee to increase the deficit by not more than $4.5 trillion relative to the CBO baseline. (If the deficit reduction failsafe is triggered, that $4.5 trillion instruction could be decreased or increased).

If the full $4.5 trillion in tax cuts are implemented, then revenues would total “only” $60.2 trillion over the FY 2025 – 2034 period.Revenues After Reconciliation

The proposed $4.5 trillion reduction in government revenues is less than 7% of the taxes in the CBO’s baseline over the next decade. Of course, any reduction in the government’s revenue is money kept in the pockets of Americans to invest in a better future for their families.Reconciliation Tax Cuts vs Revenues

 

Spending is The Problem

Most Americans recognize that the issue isn’t the government taking more of their hard-earned money. The real problem is the federal government’s excessive spending.Spending is the Problem

Annual spending is 52% higher than prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Out of control spending has driven the national debt higher than any other time in history aside from the immediate aftermath of World War II.

This growing spending is driven by autopilot spending programs. Thankfully, the budget reconciliation process will allow Congress to begin to right the ship and get our fiscal house in order.

How the Swamp Can Cope

Any member of the D.C. swamp who thinks that taxes are too low and that the government needs more money can mail a check or money order to:

Gifts to the United States

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Reporting and Analysis Branch 2

P.O. Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Of course, hardly anyone in the swamp voluntarily sends their own money to the government.

Matt Dickerson Headshot
Director of Budget Policy

Matthew D. Dickerson is Director of Budget Policy at the Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC).

Related Content

Make Aviation Great Again

The recently concluded government shutdown caused anxiety for millions of Americans making holiday travel plans. Due to a lapse in appropriations, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy had announced that the…

Subscribe

Newsletter Signup